[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F90FC91.9090805@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:05:05 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: "bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: skip dead but not buried clients on PipeFS events
20.04.2012 01:40, bfields@...ldses.org написал:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:36:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> Sorry, but ignore this patch too.
>> It can't be that simple because of these cl_count tricks in rpc_release_client...
> OK. Very minor whine:
>
>> 19.04.2012 14:57, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
>>> These clients can't be safely dereferenced if their counter in 0.
>>>
>>> Signee-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
> I don't mind fixing up trivial slips every now and then, but that double
> signed-off-by seems to happen on a lot of your posts; could you figure
> out what's up with your scripts?
Yes, sure. Sorry.
I've noticed this problem just yesterday.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists