lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=mcFFDHVkm71OC30TrbQTvay-QuCraKQ7gGyUQspQ43Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:17:13 +0530
From:	viresh kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
	sshtylyov@...sta.com, spear-devel@...t.st.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...hat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] clk: Add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines

On 4/21/12, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:17:28PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Many drivers are shared between architectures that may or may not have
>> HAVE_CLK
>> selected for them. To remove compilation errors for them we enclose
>> clk_*()
>> calls in these drivers within #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK, #endif.
>
> All you're doing is making drivers buildable.  Drivers will not be usable
> with this (they'll error out because clk_get() will fail.)
>
> For example:
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
> -/* Dummy stub for clk framework */
> -#define clk_get(dev, id)       NULL
> -#define clk_put(clock)         do {} while (0)
> -#define clk_enable(clock)      do {} while (0)
> -#define clk_disable(clock)     do {} while (0)
> -#endif
> -
>
> along with your change in this patch changes the drivers behaviour.

I tried to take care of these issues, but unfortunately
i couldn't.

Patch numbers 6, 12 & 13 will actually break drivers. Will ask Andrew
to drop them.

> A better solution would be to assume that if HAVE_CLK is not set, then
> that means there's no control over clocks, and therefore the clk API
> should become totally transparent and non-failure inducing.  So, having
> clk_get() return NULL, and having all the other clk API functions ignore
> their argument (just like the macros above) is the right solution here.

Will leave these macros as is for mentioned patches.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ