[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F93367E.1060108@xenotime.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:36:46 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Valentin Ilie <valentin.ilie@...il.com>
CC: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: sys.c: Fixed coding style issues
On 04/21/2012 03:35 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/21/2012 08:27 AM, Valentin Ilie wrote:
>
>>> This kind of patch is not easy to review.
>>> Can you please prove that no logic has changed?
>>> E.g. By comparing the object file before and after your patch...
>>
>> Everything seems to be OK.
>>
>> The diff is because the old version had an unnecessary \n in two places.
>
> But Richard asked you to compare the object files (binary files,
> kernel/sys.o) to make sure that they are the same.
>
and maybe you did that, but it's not clear that you did.
>
>> $ checkpatch.pl -q --file --terse /tmp/test/sys.c | grep total
>> total: 33 errors, 18 warnings, 2057 lines checked
>> $ checkpatch.pl -q --file --terse /tmp/test/sys_patched.c | grep total
>> total: 4 errors, 14 warnings, 2055 lines checked
>>
>> $ diff -iEbwB sys.c sys_patched.c
>> 215,216c215
>> < else if ((who != cred->uid) &&
>> < !(user = find_user(who)))
>> ---
>>> else if ((who != cred->uid) && !(user = find_user(who)))
>> 280,281c279
>> < else if ((who != cred->uid) &&
>> < !(user = find_user(who)))
>> ---
>>> else if ((who != cred->uid) && !(user = find_user(who)))
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists