[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F959F10.9010908@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:27:28 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>
CC: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/tegra: smmu: Add device tree support for SMMU
On 04/23/2012 05:58 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> Add device tree support for Tegra30 IOMMU(SMMU).
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> + err = of_parse_dma_window(dev->of_node, "dma-window", 0, NULL,
> + &base, &size);
This patch also depends on "dt: Add general DMA window parser" that you
sent earlier.
> + asids = be32_to_cpup(of_get_property(dev->of_node, "asids", NULL));
> + if (!asids)
> + return -ENODEV;
What if of_get_property() fails?
BTW, does the # ASIDs vary? I wonder if it's worth representing it in
the device tree or not. If this driver has a chance of working
unmodified on some future chip just by updating this DT property without
any code changes, then it seems reasonable to have it in DT.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists