linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120423.172848.1733968863825393980.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	smhodgson@...arflare.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	bruce.w.allan@...el.com, decot@...gle.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module
 EEPROM


You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact
Subject line.

Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what
is different in each of these changes.

There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review
them?  If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it?  If not, why not?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/