linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1335289485.17274.46.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:44:45 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<smhodgson@...arflare.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bruce.w.allan@...el.com>, <decot@...gle.com>,
	<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in module
 EEPROM

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact
> Subject line.
> 
> Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what
> is different in each of these changes.
> 
> There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review
> them?  If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it?  If not, why not?

Sorry, I've been busy with another project.  I'll reply to Stuart's
patches faster next round.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/