linux-kernel - Re: mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F9646E7.4000103@nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:53:35 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Gerard Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org>
CC:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910_sleepinit()

On Tuesday 24 April 2012 07:29 AM, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> While looking into another problem I noticed a section mismatch with
> tps65910_i2c_probe() calling tps65910_sleepinit() which is annotated
> __init. Should tps65910_i2c_probe() be annotated __init as well?
>
Yes, that should be __init. Let me know if you are sending patch or I 
need to do.

Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/