[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1204241052460.1856@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:52:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...oraproject.org, Richard Hughes <richard@...hsie.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hid-input: default HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH to no
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > Matthew suggested that additional kernel patches were required to add a
> >> > scope parameter so upower could understand that the battery is powering
> >> > a device and not the system.
> >> >
> >> > Also, when did it become OK to force-enable a new feature that is
> >> > _known_ to not work properly on recent userspace? That makes no sense
> >> > to me.
> >>
> >> I agree. It's a great feature, but it shouldn't be default y if
> >> userspace isn't ready for it yet.
> >
> > Fully agreed, the 'default y' part escaped my attention. I will be
> > applying the patch and pushing out to Linus.
> >
> > I even wonder whether we shouldn't put a warning into the Kconfig entry,
> > explaining the consequences of having userspace not ready for the feature.
>
> I saw it move from HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH=y to "# HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH
> is not set" in my max-all build.
Good point, thanks Geert. I will fix that up.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists