[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424132810.GE4030@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:28:10 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
swarren@...dotorg.org, olof@...om.net, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol
mangling
> I think the assumption was that mangling requires full control of the
> bus lines, so a driver would either support all quirks (i2c-algo-bit)
> or none (everybody else), thus having a single functionality flag. As
> it seems I2C_M_NOSTART no longer fits the "quirky" category, having a
> separate flag for it would make sense. But I would leave the rest alone
> for the time being.
OK. We can still do what I proposed just in case the other mangling
features should ever become equally important ;)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists