[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120426231203.b1fbc86e26b2c9b426b81a64@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:12:03 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tags for successful compilations of linux-next
Hi Luis,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:32:13 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org> wrote:
>
> As a daily consumer of linux-next I'm wondering if there are tags that
> perhaps could be introduced to annotate when a linux-next tag itself
> did successfully compile across all the tests you have for linux-next
> each day. As a consumer of linux-next, for example, I could just take
> those tags to ensure my own snapshots do compile as well. Checking
> with you to see if this is worth it for an extra tag to annotate these
> somehow.
Linux-next has never built for all the test builds we do :-( However,
(almost) every linux-next release does build for the following:
PowerPC: ppc64_defconfig, allnoconfig, (64bit) allnoconfig, ppc44x_defconfig,
allyesconfig (fails in the final link)
X86_64: allmodconfig
i386: defconfig
sparc: 32 and 64 bit defconfig
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists