linux-kernel - Re: Tags for successful compilations of linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB=NE6Vz3pQ-HetgGeB64R7Ld1d41TDaq4cZzP_KO+bTU0jcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:22:23 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tags for successful compilations of linux-next

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:32:13 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org> wrote:
>>
>> As a daily consumer of linux-next I'm wondering if there are tags that
>> perhaps could be introduced to annotate when a linux-next tag itself
>> did successfully compile across all the tests you have for linux-next
>> each day. As a consumer of linux-next, for example, I could just take
>> those tags to ensure my own snapshots do compile as well. Checking
>> with you to see if this is worth it for an extra tag to annotate these
>> somehow.
>
> Linux-next has never built for all the test builds we do :-(

Indeed :(

> However,
> (almost) every linux-next release does build for the following:
>
> PowerPC: ppc64_defconfig, allnoconfig, (64bit) allnoconfig, ppc44x_defconfig,
>         allyesconfig (fails in the final link)
> X86_64: allmodconfig

I just ran into two tags where drivers/net/ failed with allmodconfig
but in my tests case for x86, and hence this e-mail. Typically I
actually don't run into issues, but this got me thinking about
possible tags to annotate successful build tests.

> i386: defconfig

And now this make sense :)

> sparc: 32 and 64 bit defconfig

That's pretty impressive that all test build tests are done though and
that typically they all do work for most tags, thanks!

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/