| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120427133304.GE9626@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:33:04 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@...hat.com>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>,
Mark Gross <mark.gross@...el.com>,
Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@...mai.com>,
Tim Small <tim@...tersideup.com>,
Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@...ztechnologies.com>,
"Arvind R." <arvino55@...il.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Egor Martovetsky <egor@...emi.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...csson.com>,
Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@...escale.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDACv16 1/2] edac: Change internal representation to work
with layers
Btw,
this patch gives
[ 8.278399] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 0: dimm0 (0:0:0): row 0, chan 0
[ 8.287594] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 1: dimm1 (0:1:0): row 0, chan 1
[ 8.296784] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 2: dimm2 (1:0:0): row 1, chan 0
[ 8.305968] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 3: dimm3 (1:1:0): row 1, chan 1
[ 8.315144] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 4: dimm4 (2:0:0): row 2, chan 0
[ 8.324326] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 5: dimm5 (2:1:0): row 2, chan 1
[ 8.333502] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 6: dimm6 (3:0:0): row 3, chan 0
[ 8.342684] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 7: dimm7 (3:1:0): row 3, chan 1
[ 8.351860] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 8: dimm8 (4:0:0): row 4, chan 0
[ 8.361049] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 9: dimm9 (4:1:0): row 4, chan 1
[ 8.370227] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 10: dimm10 (5:0:0): row 5, chan 0
[ 8.379582] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 11: dimm11 (5:1:0): row 5, chan 1
[ 8.388941] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 12: dimm12 (6:0:0): row 6, chan 0
[ 8.398315] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 13: dimm13 (6:1:0): row 6, chan 1
[ 8.407680] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 14: dimm14 (7:0:0): row 7, chan 0
[ 8.417047] EDAC DEBUG: new_edac_mc_alloc: new_edac_mc_alloc: 15: dimm15 (7:1:0): row 7, chan 1
and the memory controller has the following chip selects
[ 8.137662] EDAC MC: DCT0 chip selects:
[ 8.150291] EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 2048MB 1: 2048MB
[ 8.155349] EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 2048MB 3: 2048MB
[ 8.160408] EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB
[ 8.165475] EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB
[ 8.180499] EDAC MC: DCT1 chip selects:
[ 8.184693] EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 2048MB 1: 2048MB
[ 8.189753] EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 2048MB 3: 2048MB
[ 8.194812] EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB
[ 8.199875] EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB
Those are 4 dual-ranked DIMMs on this node, DCT0 is one channel and DCT1
is another and I have 4 ranks per channel. Having dimm0-dimm15 is very
misleading and has nothing to do with the reality. So, if this is to use
your nomenclature with layers, I'll have dimm0-dimm7 where each dimm is
a rank.
Or, the most correct thing to do would be to have dimm0-dimm3, each
dual-ranked.
So either tot_dimms is computed wrongly or there's a more serious error
somewhere.
I've reviewed almost the half patch, will review the rest when/if we
sort out the above issue first.
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:15:41PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow
> based memory controllers.
>
> There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more
> are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be
> changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while
> preserving backward compatibility with the old ones.
>
> The edac core were written with the idea that memory controllers
was
> are able to directly access csrows, and that the channels are
> used inside a csrows select.
This sounds funny, simply remove that second part about the channels.
> This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers.
>
> Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows
> view. Instead, they view memories as DIMM's, instead of ranks, accessed
DIMMs instead of ranks."
Remove the rest.
> via csrow/channel.
>
> So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow
> them to work with all types of architectures.
>
> This will allow the removal of several hacks on FB-DIMM and RAMBUS
with
> memory controllers on the next patches.
. Remove the rest.
>
> Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different
> x86 drivers.
>
> TODO: a multi-rank DIMM's are currently represented by multiple DIMM
Multi-rank DIMMs
> entries at struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one
in
> rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same dimm.
of the same DIMM.
> Such bug is there since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big
This bug is present ..
> deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but
remove "on"
> it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not
> be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet.
>
> PS.: I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with
Remove "PS."
> several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the
> internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are
> generally bigger on the drivers for FB-DIMM's.
in for FB-DIMMs.
>
> FIXME: while the FB-DIMMs are not converted to use the new
> design, uncorrected errors will show just one channel. In
> the past, all changes were on a big patch with about 150K.
> As it needed to be split, in order to be accepted by the
> EDAC ML at vger, we've opted to have this small drawback.
> As an advantage, it is now easier to review the patch series.
This whole paragraph above doesn't have anything to do with what the
patch does, so it can go.
[..]
> ---
>
> v16: Only context changes
>
> drivers/edac/edac_core.h | 92 ++++++-
> drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 682 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> include/linux/edac.h | 40 ++-
> 3 files changed, 526 insertions(+), 288 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> index e48ab31..7201bb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> @@ -447,8 +447,13 @@ static inline void pci_write_bits32(struct pci_dev *pdev, int offset,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
>
> -extern struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> - unsigned nr_chans, int edac_index);
> +struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> + unsigned nr_chans, int edac_index);
Why not "extern"?
> +struct mem_ctl_info *new_edac_mc_alloc(unsigned edac_index,
> + unsigned n_layers,
> + struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
> + bool rev_order,
> + unsigned sz_pvt);
ditto.
> extern int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci);
> extern void edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci);
> extern struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_find(int idx);
> @@ -467,24 +472,80 @@ extern int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> * reporting logic and function interface - reduces conditional
> * statement clutter and extra function arguments.
> */
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> +
> +void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + const unsigned long page_frame_number,
> + const unsigned long offset_in_page,
> + const unsigned long syndrome,
> + const int layer0,
> + const int layer1,
> + const int layer2,
> + const char *msg,
> + const char *other_detail,
> + const void *mcelog);
Why isn't this one "extern" either?
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> unsigned long page_frame_number,
> unsigned long offset_in_page,
> unsigned long syndrome, int row, int channel,
> - const char *msg);
Strange alignment, pls do
static inline void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct...,
unsigned...,
...,
...);
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - const char *msg);
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + const char *msg)
> +{
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci,
> + page_frame_number, offset_in_page, syndrome,
> + row, channel, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + const char *msg)
ditto.
> +{
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci,
> + 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> unsigned long page_frame_number,
> unsigned long offset_in_page, int row,
> - const char *msg);
ditto.
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - const char *msg);
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned int csrow,
> - unsigned int channel0, unsigned int channel1,
> - char *msg);
> -extern void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned int csrow,
> - unsigned int channel, char *msg);
> + const char *msg)
> +{
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
> + page_frame_number, offset_in_page, 0,
> + row, -1, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + const char *msg)
> +{
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
> + 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + unsigned int csrow,
> + unsigned int channel0,
> + unsigned int channel1,
> + char *msg)
Now this alignment looks correct.
> +{
> + /*
> + *FIXME: The error can also be at channel1 (e. g. at the second
> + * channel of the same branch). The fix is to push
> + * edac_mc_handle_error() call into each driver
> + */
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
> + 0, 0, 0,
> + csrow, channel0, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + unsigned int csrow,
> + unsigned int channel, char *msg)
> +{
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci,
> + 0, 0, 0,
> + csrow, channel, -1, msg, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +
Two superfluous newlines.
>
> /*
> * edac_device APIs
> @@ -496,6 +557,7 @@ extern void edac_device_handle_ue(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
> extern void edac_device_handle_ce(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
> int inst_nr, int block_nr, const char *msg);
> extern int edac_device_alloc_index(void);
> +extern const char *edac_layer_name[];
>
> /*
> * edac_pci APIs
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> index 6ec967a..4d4d8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> @@ -44,9 +44,25 @@ static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan)
> debugf4("\tchannel = %p\n", chan);
> debugf4("\tchannel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx);
> debugf4("\tchannel->csrow = %p\n\n", chan->csrow);
> - debugf4("\tdimm->ce_count = %d\n", chan->dimm->ce_count);
> - debugf4("\tdimm->label = '%s'\n", chan->dimm->label);
> - debugf4("\tdimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", chan->dimm->nr_pages);
> + debugf4("\tchannel->dimm = %p\n", chan->dimm);
> +}
> +
> +static void edac_mc_dump_dimm(struct dimm_info *dimm)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + debugf4("\tdimm = %p\n", dimm);
> + debugf4("\tdimm->label = '%s'\n", dimm->label);
> + debugf4("\tdimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
> + debugf4("\tdimm location ");
> + for (i = 0; i < dimm->mci->n_layers; i++) {
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%d", dimm->location[i]);
> + if (i < dimm->mci->n_layers - 1)
> + printk(KERN_CONT ".");
> + }
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
This looks hacky but I don't have a good suggestion what to do instead
here. Maybe snprintf into a complete string which you can issue with
debugf4()...
> + debugf4("\tdimm->grain = %d\n", dimm->grain);
> + debugf4("\tdimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
> }
>
> static void edac_mc_dump_csrow(struct csrow_info *csrow)
> @@ -70,6 +86,8 @@ static void edac_mc_dump_mci(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> debugf4("\tmci->edac_check = %p\n", mci->edac_check);
> debugf3("\tmci->nr_csrows = %d, csrows = %p\n",
> mci->nr_csrows, mci->csrows);
> + debugf3("\tmci->nr_dimms = %d, dimns = %p\n",
->tot_dimms dimms
> + mci->tot_dimms, mci->dimms);
> debugf3("\tdev = %p\n", mci->dev);
> debugf3("\tmod_name:ctl_name = %s:%s\n", mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name);
> debugf3("\tpvt_info = %p\n\n", mci->pvt_info);
> @@ -157,10 +175,25 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
> }
>
> /**
> - * edac_mc_alloc: Allocate a struct mem_ctl_info structure
> - * @size_pvt: size of private storage needed
> - * @nr_csrows: Number of CWROWS needed for this MC
> - * @nr_chans: Number of channels for the MC
> + * edac_mc_alloc: Allocate and partially fills a struct mem_ctl_info structure
fill
> + * @edac_index: Memory controller number
> + * @n_layers: Number of layers at the MC hierarchy
Number of MC hierarchy layers
> + * layers: Describes each layer as seen by the Memory Controller
> + * @rev_order: Fills csrows/cs channels at the reverse order
csrows/channels in reverse order
> + * @size_pvt: size of private storage needed
> + *
> + *
> + * FIXME: drivers handle multi-rank memories on different ways: on some
in in
> + * drivers, one multi-rank memory is mapped as one DIMM, while, on others,
memory stick in
> + * a single multi-rank DIMM would be mapped into several "dimms".
memory stick
> + *
> + * Non-csrow based drivers (like FB-DIMM and RAMBUS ones) will likely report
> + * such DIMMS properly, but the CSROWS-based ones will likely do the wrong
csrow-based
> + * thing, as two chip select values are used for dual-rank memories (and 4, for
> + * quad-rank ones). I suspect that this issue could be solved inside the EDAC
> + * core for SDRAM memories, but it requires further study at JEDEC JESD 21C.
> + *
> + * In summary, solving this issue is not easy, as it requires a lot of testing.
> *
> * Everything is kmalloc'ed as one big chunk - more efficient.
> * Only can be used if all structures have the same lifetime - otherwise
> @@ -172,18 +205,41 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
> * NULL allocation failed
> * struct mem_ctl_info pointer
> */
> -struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> - unsigned nr_chans, int edac_index)
> +struct mem_ctl_info *new_edac_mc_alloc(unsigned edac_index,
> + unsigned n_layers,
> + struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
> + bool rev_order,
> + unsigned sz_pvt)
strange function argument vertical alignment
> {
> void *ptr = NULL;
> struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> - struct csrow_info *csi, *csrow;
> + struct edac_mc_layer *lay;
As before, call this "layers" pls.
> + struct csrow_info *csi, *csr;
> struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan;
> struct dimm_info *dimm;
> + u32 *ce_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS], *ue_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
> void *pvt;
> - unsigned size;
> - int row, chn;
> + unsigned size, tot_dimms, count, pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
> + unsigned tot_csrows, tot_cschannels;
No need to call this "tot_cschannels" - "tot_channels" should be enough.
> + int i, j;
> int err;
> + int row, chn;
All those local variables should be sorted in a reverse christmas tree
order:
u32 this_is_the_longest_array_name[LENGTH];
void *shorter_named_variable;
unsigned long size;
int i;
...
> +
> + BUG_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS);
Push this BUG_ON up into edac_mc_alloc as the first thing this function
does. Also, is it valid to have n_layers == 0? The memcpy call below
will do nothing.
> + /*
> + * Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
> + * in the old API emulation mode
> + */
> + tot_dimms = 1;
> + tot_cschannels = 1;
> + tot_csrows = 1;
Those initializations can be done above at variable declaration time.
> + for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
> + tot_dimms *= layers[i].size;
> + if (layers[i].is_virt_csrow)
> + tot_csrows *= layers[i].size;
> + else
> + tot_cschannels *= layers[i].size;
> + }
>
> /* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
> * structure. We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
> @@ -191,12 +247,21 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> * hardcode everything into a single struct.
> */
> mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
> - csi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*csi), nr_csrows);
> - chi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*chi), nr_csrows * nr_chans);
> - dimm = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*dimm), nr_csrows * nr_chans);
> + lay = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*lay), n_layers);
> + csi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*csi), tot_csrows);
> + chi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*chi), tot_csrows * tot_cschannels);
> + dimm = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*dimm), tot_dimms);
> + count = 1;
ditto.
> + for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
> + count *= layers[i].size;
> + ce_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
> + ue_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
> + }
> pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
> size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
>
> + debugf1("%s(): allocating %u bytes for mci data (%d dimms, %d csrows/channels)\n",
> + __func__, size, tot_dimms, tot_csrows * tot_cschannels);
> mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (mci == NULL)
> return NULL;
> @@ -204,42 +269,99 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> /* Adjust pointers so they point within the memory we just allocated
> * rather than an imaginary chunk of memory located at address 0.
> */
> + lay = (struct edac_mc_layer *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)lay));
> csi = (struct csrow_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)csi));
> chi = (struct rank_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)chi));
> dimm = (struct dimm_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)dimm));
> + for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
> + mci->ce_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ce_per_layer[i]));
> + mci->ue_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ue_per_layer[i]));
> + }
> pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
>
> /* setup index and various internal pointers */
> mci->mc_idx = edac_index;
> mci->csrows = csi;
> mci->dimms = dimm;
> + mci->tot_dimms = tot_dimms;
> mci->pvt_info = pvt;
> - mci->nr_csrows = nr_csrows;
> + mci->n_layers = n_layers;
> + mci->layers = lay;
> + memcpy(mci->layers, layers, sizeof(*lay) * n_layers);
> + mci->nr_csrows = tot_csrows;
> + mci->num_cschannel = tot_cschannels;
>
> /*
> - * For now, assumes that a per-csrow arrangement for dimms.
> - * This will be latter changed.
> + * Fills the csrow struct
> */
> - dimm = mci->dimms;
> -
> - for (row = 0; row < nr_csrows; row++) {
> - csrow = &csi[row];
> - csrow->csrow_idx = row;
> - csrow->mci = mci;
> - csrow->nr_channels = nr_chans;
> - chp = &chi[row * nr_chans];
> - csrow->channels = chp;
> -
> - for (chn = 0; chn < nr_chans; chn++) {
> + for (row = 0; row < tot_csrows; row++) {
> + csr = &csi[row];
> + csr->csrow_idx = row;
> + csr->mci = mci;
> + csr->nr_channels = tot_cschannels;
> + chp = &chi[row * tot_cschannels];
> + csr->channels = chp;
> +
> + for (chn = 0; chn < tot_cschannels; chn++) {
> chan = &chp[chn];
> chan->chan_idx = chn;
> - chan->csrow = csrow;
> + chan->csrow = csr;
> + }
> + }
>
> - mci->csrows[row].channels[chn].dimm = dimm;
> - dimm->csrow = row;
> - dimm->csrow_channel = chn;
> - dimm++;
> - mci->nr_dimms++;
> + /*
> + * Fills the dimm struct
> + */
> + memset(&pos, 0, sizeof(pos));
> + row = 0;
> + chn = 0;
> + debugf4("%s: initializing %d dimms\n", __func__, tot_dimms);
> + for (i = 0; i < tot_dimms; i++) {
> + chan = &csi[row].channels[chn];
> + dimm = EDAC_DIMM_PTR(lay, mci->dimms, n_layers,
> + pos[0], pos[1], pos[2]);
> + dimm->mci = mci;
> +
> + debugf2("%s: %d: dimm%zd (%d:%d:%d): row %d, chan %d\n", __func__,
> + i, (dimm - mci->dimms),
> + pos[0], pos[1], pos[2], row, chn);
> +
> + /* Copy DIMM location */
> + for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++)
> + dimm->location[j] = pos[j];
> +
> + /* Link it to the csrows old API data */
> + chan->dimm = dimm;
> + dimm->csrow = row;
> + dimm->cschannel = chn;
> +
> + /* Increment csrow location */
> + if (!rev_order) {
> + for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--)
> + if (!layers[j].is_virt_csrow)
> + break;
> + chn++;
> + if (chn == tot_cschannels) {
> + chn = 0;
> + row++;
> + }
> + } else {
> + for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--)
> + if (layers[j].is_virt_csrow)
> + break;
> + row++;
> + if (row == tot_csrows) {
> + row = 0;
> + chn++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Increment dimm location */
> + for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
> + pos[j]++;
> + if (pos[j] < layers[j].size)
> + break;
> + pos[j] = 0;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -263,6 +385,57 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> */
> return mci;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(new_edac_mc_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * edac_mc_alloc: Allocate and partially fills a struct mem_ctl_info structure
> + * @edac_index: Memory controller number
> + * @n_layers: Nu
> +mber of layers at the MC hierarchy
> + * layers: Describes each layer as seen by the Memory Controller
> + * @rev_order: Fills csrows/cs channels at the reverse order
> + * @size_pvt: size of private storage needed
> + *
> + *
> + * FIXME: drivers handle multi-rank memories on different ways: on some
> + * drivers, one multi-rank memory is mapped as one DIMM, while, on others,
> + * a single multi-rank DIMM would be mapped into several "dimms".
> + *
> + * Non-csrow based drivers (like FB-DIMM and RAMBUS ones) will likely report
> + * such DIMMS properly, but the CSROWS-based ones will likely do the wrong
> + * thing, as two chip select values are used for dual-rank memories (and 4, for
> + * quad-rank ones). I suspect that this issue could be solved inside the EDAC
> + * core for SDRAM memories, but it requires further study at JEDEC JESD 21C.
> + *
> + * In summary, solving this issue is not easy, as it requires a lot of testing.
> + *
> + * Everything is kmalloc'ed as one big chunk - more efficient.
> + * Only can be used if all structures have the same lifetime - otherwise
> + * you have to allocate and initialize your own structures.
> + *
> + * Use edac_mc_free() to free mc structures allocated by this function.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * NULL allocation failed
> + * struct mem_ctl_info pointer
> + */
> +
> +struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> + unsigned nr_chans, int edac_index)
> +{
> + unsigned n_layers = 2;
> + struct edac_mc_layer layers[n_layers];
> +
> + layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT;
> + layers[0].size = nr_csrows;
> + layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
> + layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
> + layers[1].size = nr_chans;
> + layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false;
> +
> + return new_edac_mc_alloc(edac_index, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers,
> + false, sz_pvt);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
>
> /**
> @@ -528,7 +701,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_find);
> * edac_mc_add_mc: Insert the 'mci' structure into the mci global list and
> * create sysfs entries associated with mci structure
> * @mci: pointer to the mci structure to be added to the list
> - * @mc_idx: A unique numeric identifier to be assigned to the 'mci' structure.
> *
> * Return:
> * 0 Success
> @@ -555,6 +727,8 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> edac_mc_dump_channel(&mci->csrows[i].
> channels[j]);
> }
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++)
> + edac_mc_dump_dimm(&mci->dimms[i]);
> }
> #endif
> mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
> @@ -712,261 +886,249 @@ int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned long page)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page);
>
> -/* FIXME - setable log (warning/emerg) levels */
> -/* FIXME - integrate with evlog: http://evlog.sourceforge.net/ */
> -void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - unsigned long page_frame_number,
> - unsigned long offset_in_page, unsigned long syndrome,
> - int row, int channel, const char *msg)
> +const char *edac_layer_name[] = {
> + [EDAC_MC_LAYER_BRANCH] = "branch",
> + [EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL] = "channel",
> + [EDAC_MC_LAYER_SLOT] = "slot",
> + [EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT] = "csrow",
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_layer_name);
> +
> +static void edac_increment_ce_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + bool enable_filter,
> + unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
> {
> - unsigned long remapped_page;
> - char *label = NULL;
> - u32 grain;
> + int i, index = 0;
>
> - debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__);
> + mci->ce_mc++;
>
> - /* FIXME - maybe make panic on INTERNAL ERROR an option */
> - if (row >= mci->nr_csrows || row < 0) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: row out of range "
> - "(%d >= %d)\n", row, mci->nr_csrows);
> - edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> + if (!enable_filter) {
> + mci->ce_noinfo_count++;
> return;
> }
>
> - if (channel >= mci->csrows[row].nr_channels || channel < 0) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: channel out of range "
> - "(%d >= %d)\n", channel,
> - mci->csrows[row].nr_channels);
> - edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - label = mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].dimm->label;
> - grain = mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].dimm->grain;
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
> + if (pos[i] < 0)
> + break;
> + index += pos[i];
> + mci->ce_per_layer[i][index]++;
>
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
> - /* FIXME - put in DIMM location */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> - "CE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d, syndrome "
> - "0x%lx, row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n",
> - page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
> - grain, syndrome, row, channel,
> - label, msg);
> + if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
> + index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
> + }
> +}
>
> - mci->ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[row].ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].dimm->ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].ce_count++;
> +static void edac_increment_ue_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + bool enable_filter,
> + unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
> +{
> + int i, index = 0;
>
> - if (mci->scrub_mode & SCRUB_SW_SRC) {
> - /*
> - * Some MC's can remap memory so that it is still available
> - * at a different address when PCI devices map into memory.
> - * MC's that can't do this lose the memory where PCI devices
> - * are mapped. This mapping is MC dependent and so we call
> - * back into the MC driver for it to map the MC page to
> - * a physical (CPU) page which can then be mapped to a virtual
> - * page - which can then be scrubbed.
> - */
> - remapped_page = mci->ctl_page_to_phys ?
> - mci->ctl_page_to_phys(mci, page_frame_number) :
> - page_frame_number;
> + mci->ue_mc++;
>
> - edac_mc_scrub_block(remapped_page, offset_in_page, grain);
> + if (!enable_filter) {
> + mci->ce_noinfo_count++;
> + return;
> }
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_ce);
>
> -void edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, const char *msg)
> -{
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> - "CE - no information available: %s\n", msg);
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
> + if (pos[i] < 0)
> + break;
> + index += pos[i];
> + mci->ue_per_layer[i][index]++;
>
> - mci->ce_noinfo_count++;
> - mci->ce_count++;
> + if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
> + index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
> + }
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info);
>
> -void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - unsigned long page_frame_number,
> - unsigned long offset_in_page, int row, const char *msg)
> +#define OTHER_LABEL " or "
> +void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + const unsigned long page_frame_number,
> + const unsigned long offset_in_page,
> + const unsigned long syndrome,
> + const int layer0,
> + const int layer1,
> + const int layer2,
> + const char *msg,
> + const char *other_detail,
> + const void *mcelog)
> {
> - int len = EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN * 4;
> - char labels[len + 1];
> - char *pos = labels;
> - int chan;
> - int chars;
> - char *label = NULL;
> + unsigned long remapped_page;
> + /* FIXME: too much for stack: move it to some pre-alocated area */
> + char detail[80], location[80];
> + char label[(EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN + 1 + sizeof(OTHER_LABEL)) * mci->tot_dimms];
> + char *p;
> + int row = -1, chan = -1;
> + int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS] = { layer0, layer1, layer2 };
> + int i;
> u32 grain;
> + bool enable_filter = false;
>
> debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__);
>
> - /* FIXME - maybe make panic on INTERNAL ERROR an option */
> - if (row >= mci->nr_csrows || row < 0) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: row out of range "
> - "(%d >= %d)\n", row, mci->nr_csrows);
> - edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - grain = mci->csrows[row].channels[0].dimm->grain;
> - label = mci->csrows[row].channels[0].dimm->label;
> - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label);
> - len -= chars;
> - pos += chars;
> -
> - for (chan = 1; (chan < mci->csrows[row].nr_channels) && (len > 0);
> - chan++) {
> - label = mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].dimm->label;
> - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, ":%s", label);
> - len -= chars;
> - pos += chars;
> + /* Check if the event report is consistent */
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
> + if (pos[i] >= (int)mci->layers[i].size) {
> + if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
> + p = "CE";
> + mci->ce_mc++;
> + } else {
> + p = "UE";
> + mci->ue_mc++;
> + }
> + edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> + "INTERNAL ERROR: %s value is out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
> + edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
> + pos[i], mci->layers[i].size);
> + /*
> + * Instead of just returning it, let's use what's
> + * known about the error. The increment routines and
> + * the DIMM filter logic will do the right thing by
> + * pointing the likely damaged DIMMs.
> + */
> + pos[i] = -1;
> + }
> + if (pos[i] >= 0)
> + enable_filter = true;
> }
>
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_EMERG,
> - "UE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d, row %d, "
> - "labels \"%s\": %s\n", page_frame_number,
> - offset_in_page, grain, row, labels, msg);
> -
> - if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue())
> - panic("EDAC MC%d: UE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d, "
> - "row %d, labels \"%s\": %s\n", mci->mc_idx,
> - page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
> - grain, row, labels, msg);
> -
> - mci->ue_count++;
> - mci->csrows[row].ue_count++;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_ue);
> + /*
> + * Get the dimm label/grain that applies to the match criteria.
> + * As the error algorithm may not be able to point to just one memory,
> + * the logic here will get all possible labels that could pottentially
> + * be affected by the error.
> + * On FB-DIMM memory controllers, for uncorrected errors, it is common
> + * to have only the MC channel and the MC dimm (also called as "rank")
> + * but the channel is not known, as the memory is arranged in pairs,
> + * where each memory belongs to a separate channel within the same
> + * branch.
> + * It will also get the max grain, over the error match range
> + */
> + grain = 0;
> + p = label;
> + *p = '\0';
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++) {
> + struct dimm_info *dimm = &mci->dimms[i];
>
> -void edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, const char *msg)
> -{
> - if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue())
> - panic("EDAC MC%d: Uncorrected Error", mci->mc_idx);
> + if (layer0 >= 0 && layer0 != dimm->location[0])
> + continue;
> + if (layer1 >= 0 && layer1 != dimm->location[1])
> + continue;
> + if (layer2 >= 0 && layer2 != dimm->location[2])
> + continue;
>
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> - "UE - no information available: %s\n", msg);
> - mci->ue_noinfo_count++;
> - mci->ue_count++;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info);
> + if (dimm->grain > grain)
> + grain = dimm->grain;
>
> -/*************************************************************
> - * On Fully Buffered DIMM modules, this help function is
> - * called to process UE events
> - */
> -void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - unsigned int csrow,
> - unsigned int channela,
> - unsigned int channelb, char *msg)
> -{
> - int len = EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN * 4;
> - char labels[len + 1];
> - char *pos = labels;
> - int chars;
> - char *label;
> -
> - if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: row out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
> - csrow, mci->nr_csrows);
> - edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> + /*
> + * If the error is memory-controller wide, there's no sense
> + * on seeking for the affected DIMMs, as everything may be
> + * affected. Also, don't show errors for non-filled dimm's.
> + */
> + if (enable_filter && dimm->nr_pages) {
> + if (p != label) {
> + strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
> + p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
> + }
> + strcpy(p, dimm->label);
> + p += strlen(p);
> + *p = '\0';
> +
> + /*
> + * get csrow/channel of the dimm, in order to allow
> + * incrementing the compat API counters
> + */
> + debugf4("%s: dimm csrows (%d,%d)\n",
> + __func__, dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
> + if (row == -1)
> + row = dimm->csrow;
> + else if (row >= 0 && row != dimm->csrow)
> + row = -2;
> + if (chan == -1)
> + chan = dimm->cschannel;
> + else if (chan >= 0 && chan != dimm->cschannel)
> + chan = -2;
> + }
> }
> -
> - if (channela >= mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: channel-a out of range "
> - "(%d >= %d)\n",
> - channela, mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels);
> - edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> + if (!enable_filter) {
> + strcpy(label, "any memory");
> + } else {
> + debugf4("%s: csrow/channel to increment: (%d,%d)\n",
> + __func__, row, chan);
> + if (p == label)
> + strcpy(label, "unknown memory");
> + if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
> + if (row >= 0) {
> + mci->csrows[row].ce_count++;
> + if (chan >= 0)
> + mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].ce_count++;
> + }
> + } else
> + if (row >= 0)
> + mci->csrows[row].ue_count++;
> }
>
> - if (channelb >= mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: channel-b out of range "
> - "(%d >= %d)\n",
> - channelb, mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels);
> - edac_mc_handle_ue_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> + /* Fill the RAM location data */
> + p = location;
> + for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
> + if (pos[i] < 0)
> + continue;
> + p += sprintf(p, "%s %d ",
> + edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
> + pos[i]);
> }
>
> - mci->ue_count++;
> - mci->csrows[csrow].ue_count++;
> -
> - /* Generate the DIMM labels from the specified channels */
> - label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channela].dimm->label;
> - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "%s", label);
> - len -= chars;
> - pos += chars;
> -
> - chars = snprintf(pos, len + 1, "-%s",
> - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channelb].dimm->label);
> -
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_EMERG,
> - "UE row %d, channel-a= %d channel-b= %d "
> - "labels \"%s\": %s\n", csrow, channela, channelb,
> - labels, msg);
> -
> - if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue())
> - panic("UE row %d, channel-a= %d channel-b= %d "
> - "labels \"%s\": %s\n", csrow, channela,
> - channelb, labels, msg);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_handle_fbd_ue);
> + /* Memory type dependent details about the error */
> + if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED)
> + snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
> + "page 0x%lx offset 0x%lx grain %d syndrome 0x%lx",
> + page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
> + grain, syndrome);
> + else
> + snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
> + "page 0x%lx offset 0x%lx grain %d",
> + page_frame_number, offset_in_page, grain);
> +
> + if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
> + if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
> + edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> + "CE %s on %s (%s%s %s)\n",
> + msg, label, location,
> + detail, other_detail);
> + edac_increment_ce_error(mci, enable_filter, pos);
> +
> + if (mci->scrub_mode & SCRUB_SW_SRC) {
> + /*
> + * Some MC's can remap memory so that it is still
> + * available at a different address when PCI devices
> + * map into memory.
> + * MC's that can't do this lose the memory where PCI
> + * devices are mapped. This mapping is MC dependent
> + * and so we call back into the MC driver for it to
> + * map the MC page to a physical (CPU) page which can
> + * then be mapped to a virtual page - which can then
> + * be scrubbed.
> + */
> + remapped_page = mci->ctl_page_to_phys ?
> + mci->ctl_page_to_phys(mci, page_frame_number) :
> + page_frame_number;
> +
> + edac_mc_scrub_block(remapped_page,
> + offset_in_page, grain);
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
> + edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> + "UE %s on %s (%s%s %s)\n",
> + msg, label, location, detail, other_detail);
>
> -/*************************************************************
> - * On Fully Buffered DIMM modules, this help function is
> - * called to process CE events
> - */
> -void edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> - unsigned int csrow, unsigned int channel, char *msg)
> -{
> - char *label = NULL;
> + if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue())
> + panic("UE %s on %s (%s%s %s)\n",
> + msg, label, location, detail, other_detail);
>
> - /* Ensure boundary values */
> - if (csrow >= mci->nr_csrows) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: row out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
> - csrow, mci->nr_csrows);
> - edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> + edac_increment_ue_error(mci, enable_filter, pos);
> }
> - if (channel >= mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels) {
> - /* something is wrong */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> - "INTERNAL ERROR: channel out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
> - channel, mci->csrows[csrow].nr_channels);
> - edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "INTERNAL ERROR");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - label = mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].dimm->label;
> -
> - if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
> - /* FIXME - put in DIMM location */
> - edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
> - "CE row %d, channel %d, label \"%s\": %s\n",
> - csrow, channel, label, msg);
> -
> - mci->ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[csrow].ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].dimm->ce_count++;
> - mci->csrows[csrow].channels[channel].ce_count++;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_handle_fbd_ce);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_error);
> diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h
> index 3b8798d..412d5cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/edac.h
> +++ b/include/linux/edac.h
> @@ -412,18 +412,20 @@ struct edac_mc_layer {
> /* FIXME: add the proper per-location error counts */
> struct dimm_info {
> char label[EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN + 1]; /* DIMM label on motherboard */
> - unsigned memory_controller;
> - unsigned csrow;
> - unsigned csrow_channel;
> +
> + /* Memory location data */
> + unsigned location[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
> +
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci; /* the parent */
>
> u32 grain; /* granularity of reported error in bytes */
> enum dev_type dtype; /* memory device type */
> enum mem_type mtype; /* memory dimm type */
> enum edac_type edac_mode; /* EDAC mode for this dimm */
>
> - u32 nr_pages; /* number of pages in csrow */
> + u32 nr_pages; /* number of pages on this dimm */
>
> - u32 ce_count; /* Correctable Errors for this dimm */
> + unsigned csrow, cschannel; /* Points to the old API data */
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -443,9 +445,10 @@ struct dimm_info {
> */
> struct rank_info {
> int chan_idx;
> - u32 ce_count;
> struct csrow_info *csrow;
> struct dimm_info *dimm;
> +
> + u32 ce_count; /* Correctable Errors for this csrow */
> };
>
> struct csrow_info {
> @@ -497,6 +500,11 @@ struct mcidev_sysfs_attribute {
> ssize_t (*store)(struct mem_ctl_info *, const char *,size_t);
> };
>
> +struct edac_hierarchy {
> + char *name;
> + unsigned nr;
> +};
> +
> /* MEMORY controller information structure
> */
> struct mem_ctl_info {
> @@ -541,13 +549,16 @@ struct mem_ctl_info {
> unsigned long (*ctl_page_to_phys) (struct mem_ctl_info * mci,
> unsigned long page);
> int mc_idx;
> - int nr_csrows;
> struct csrow_info *csrows;
> + unsigned nr_csrows, num_cschannel;
>
> + /* Memory Controller hierarchy */
> + unsigned n_layers;
> + struct edac_mc_layer *layers;
> /*
> * DIMM info. Will eventually remove the entire csrows_info some day
> */
> - unsigned nr_dimms;
> + unsigned tot_dimms;
> struct dimm_info *dimms;
>
> /*
> @@ -562,12 +573,15 @@ struct mem_ctl_info {
> const char *dev_name;
> char proc_name[MC_PROC_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1];
> void *pvt_info;
> - u32 ue_noinfo_count; /* Uncorrectable Errors w/o info */
> - u32 ce_noinfo_count; /* Correctable Errors w/o info */
> - u32 ue_count; /* Total Uncorrectable Errors for this MC */
> - u32 ce_count; /* Total Correctable Errors for this MC */
> + u32 ue_count; /* Total Uncorrectable Errors for this MC */
> + u32 ce_count; /* Total Correctable Errors for this MC */
> unsigned long start_time; /* mci load start time (in jiffies) */
>
> + /* drivers shouldn't access this struct directly */
> + unsigned ce_noinfo_count, ue_noinfo_count;
> + unsigned ce_mc, ue_mc;
> + u32 *ce_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS], *ue_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
> +
> struct completion complete;
>
> /* edac sysfs device control */
> @@ -580,7 +594,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info {
> * by the low level driver.
> *
> * Set by the low level driver to provide attributes at the
> - * controller level, same level as 'ue_count' and 'ce_count' above.
> + * controller level.
> * An array of structures, NULL terminated
> *
> * If attributes are desired, then set to array of attributes
> --
> 1.7.8
>
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists