linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: support gpio request deferred probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:17:26 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: support gpio request deferred probing

On 04/26/2012 03:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>>
>> As pinctrl handles, it may be possible the pinctrl gpio ranges
>> are still not got registered when user call pinctrl_gpio_request.
>> Thus, add defer support for it too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
> 
> Since nobody is saying anything and it looks reasonable,
> I just applied this.

I didn't look at this, because V4 was sent without this patch, so I
assumed it'd been dropped by Dong. Was I wrong?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/