[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120427031331.GD26070@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:13:32 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linus.walleij@...ricsson.com" <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: support gpio request deferred probing
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:17:26AM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 03:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> As pinctrl handles, it may be possible the pinctrl gpio ranges
> >> are still not got registered when user call pinctrl_gpio_request.
> >> Thus, add defer support for it too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
> >
> > Since nobody is saying anything and it looks reasonable,
> > I just applied this.
>
> I didn't look at this, because V4 was sent without this patch, so I
> assumed it'd been dropped by Dong. Was I wrong?
>
I thought this patch had no relationship with dummy state v4 patch and
it had no changes, so i did not resend it out with the v4 patch again.
It did not mean drop. Sorry for causing confusing.
Anyway thanks for your attention.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists