lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9ADD22.70003@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:53:38 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions

On 04/27/2012 10:14 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> If you remove the architecture-specific drivers, there's really not a lot left
> and, even then, we only need to convert those drivers which are intended to
> be portable between architectures where the string functions are not
> consistently available.
> 
> By overheads, I assume you're referring to the IO_COND check on the address
> space? I wouldn't expect this to be noticeable compared to the cost of the
> I/O access and I'm not sure it's worth worrying about for the sake of the
> small number of drivers affected.
> 

It's not in time, but it adds bulk to the code.  The point is that what
is the benefit of not making these part of the general API?  For
architectures where the address space doesn't matter they could just
alias it to the same functions, or use the generic versions.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ