[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9ADD22.70003@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:53:38 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions
On 04/27/2012 10:14 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> If you remove the architecture-specific drivers, there's really not a lot left
> and, even then, we only need to convert those drivers which are intended to
> be portable between architectures where the string functions are not
> consistently available.
>
> By overheads, I assume you're referring to the IO_COND check on the address
> space? I wouldn't expect this to be noticeable compared to the cost of the
> I/O access and I'm not sure it's worth worrying about for the sake of the
> small number of drivers affected.
>
It's not in time, but it adds bulk to the code. The point is that what
is the benefit of not making these part of the general API? For
architectures where the address space doesn't matter they could just
alias it to the same functions, or use the generic versions.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists