[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120502115447.7dcc3a54@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:54:47 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to
partition
On Wed, 02 May 2012 12:15:10 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> Il 02/05/2012 12:10, Jan Kara ha scritto:
> > Sometimes, warnings about ioctls to partition happen often enough that they
> > form majority of the warnings in the kernel log and users complain. In some
> > cases warnings are about ioctls such as SG_IO so it's not good to get rid of
> > the warnings completely as they can ease debugging of userspace problems
> > when ioctl is refused.
> >
> > Since I have seen warnings from lots of commands, including some proprietary
> > userspace applications, I don't think disallowing the ioctls for processes
> > with CAP_SYS_RAWIO will happen in the near future if ever. So lets just
> > stop warning for processes with CAP_SYS_RAWIO for which ioctl is allowed.
>
> NACK. I would bet that all the warnings you've seen are for ioctl that
> would have failed anyway with ENOTTY.
Then we don't need the bogus warning do we.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists