lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2012 12:55:28 +0200
From:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hid: Introduce device groups

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
>> > It's currently in a shape I would be okay to pushing out for -next and
>> > scheduling for next merge window, and I will do so tomorrow if nothing
>> > else pops up during testing or reviews.
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> Well, I'm back in my lab this morning, and I'm testing your branch
>> against the different devices we have here. I'm observing a strange
>> problem: when connecting some devices, the first touch is always at
>> 0,0. If I rmmod and insmod hid_multitouch it seems to work after....
>>
>> I'm investigating this bug now. I'll tell you when I'm done. I still
>> don't now if it's related to Henrik's changes or 3.4-rc4.
>
> I see, thanks a lot for the heads-up, I will be waiting for your analysis
> of this.
>
> I have already renamed the branch to 'device-groups' and merged it into
> branch that goes into next, so please send me any followup patches on top
> of that queue now.

Ok, I think I understood: nothing related to Henrik's changes. The bug
is also present in the upstream kernel.
In the function set_last_slot_field, I was doing a:
test_bit(usage->hid, hi->input->absbit);

for instance, 0x10030 (X hid field) in the absbit bit field which
contains only ABS_CNT (0x40) bits.... That's why it was a random bug.
Now I understood why Ubuntu complained about this test ;-)

I won't have the time to submit the patch right now, I have to give a
lecture this afternoon. Maybe this evening or tomorrow.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists