[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lilahep5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:23:26 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu, jeremy@...p.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others
On Wed, 02 May 2012 12:20:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:21 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > [root@...1 linux]# grep HAVE_RCU_TABLE .config
> > CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y
> > [root@...1 linux]# make -j32 -s
> > mm/memory.c: In function ‘tlb_remove_table_one’:
> > mm/memory.c:315: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__tlb_remove_table’
> >
> > I suppose we need to have __tlb_remove_table. Trying to understand what
> > needs to be done there.
>
> Argh, I really should get back to unifying all mmu-gather
> implementations :/
>
> I think something like the below ought to sort it.
>
Thanks a lot.
> Completely untested though..
>
Tested-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Here is the comparison with the other version.
Gang pv_spin_flush pv_spin_flush_rcu
1VM 1.01 0.49 0.49
2VMs 7.07 4.04 4.06
4VMs 9.07 5.27 5.19
8VMs 9.99 7.65 7.80
Will test other use cases as well and report back.
Regards
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists