linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120502191938.GA18180@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2012 12:19:38 -0700
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, h@...gutronix.de,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.

On 20120502-07:16, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I could use some suggestions on the best way to resolve the merge issues
> > we have currently.  It appears that we have three bases that platforms
> > need to port over the common clk framework:
> > 
> > Russell's clkdev
> > Arnd's arm-soc
> > My clk-next branch
> 
> Hi Mike
> 
> The Orion code only depends on clk-next. I've been more conservative
> with the changes, knowing that once they are merged i can add more
> patches to make use of devm_get_clk() etc.
> 
> So for my, as well as going in via arm-soc, i could also imaging
> giving you a pull request and becoming part of clk-next. However, i
> don't care what route they take.
> 

Hi Andrew,

The choice is yours.

Regards,
Mike

>       Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/