[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120503230308.GA13016@glitch>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 01:03:08 +0200
From: Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58:56PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 90627e4..8ea11b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> {
> struct clk_divider *div;
> struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
>
> /* allocate the divider */
> div = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_divider), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -175,19 +176,22 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
> + init.flags = flags;
> + init.parent_names = (parent_name ? &parent_name: NULL);
> + init.num_parents = (parent_name ? 1 : 0);
> +
> /* struct clk_divider assignments */
> div->reg = reg;
> div->shift = shift;
> div->width = width;
> div->flags = clk_divider_flags;
> div->lock = lock;
> + div->hw.init = &init;
>
> /* register the clock */
> - clk = clk_register(dev, name,
> - &clk_divider_ops, &div->hw,
> - (parent_name ? &parent_name: NULL),
> - (parent_name ? 1 : 0),
> - flags);
> + clk = clk_register(dev, &div->hw);
>
> if (IS_ERR(clk))
> kfree(div);
I would prefer to rip the parent _settings_ configuration out of
clk_register(). It's optional right? And passing a single parent is a
common case.
Three cases:
1) one parent:
__clk_register_parent(clk, parent_name);
clk_register(dev, name, &ops, flags);
2) many parents:
__clk_register_parents(clk, parent_names, num_parents);
clk_register(dev, name, &ops, flags);
3) no parents:
clk_register(dev, name, &ops, flags);
You may also want to move the whole parent initialization into
__clk_register_parents() and call it after clk_register(), it would
simplify some error paths.
This pattern could be used also with other common clocks registration
functions (fixed rate, divider, mux, etc) that may have complex
initializations and/or optional parameters that cannot go all on the
same function call.
cheers,
Domenico
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists