[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA19DC8.2030001@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 22:49:12 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition
Il 02/05/2012 17:49, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> > Customisable filters are not hard. We've got all the filtering code in
>> > kernel and the ability to verify filters, even the ability to JIT them.
>> > Just support adding/removing/running a BPF filter on the channel in
>> > question.
>> >
>> > So it shouldn't be much code to do what you want.
> Yes, it's not much code if I don't get into cgroups land and stick with
> a ioctl to add and remove BPF filters that look at CDBs.
Except that then I need to access some "struct file" member in SG_IO,
thus changing ioctl from block_device/fmode to block_device/file. This
would partially undo the 2007 switch from inode/file by Al Viro.
Somehow I'm not that optimist anymore, though I'd be happy to be proven
wrong.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists