[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJFanXfohBi3ox4XGJ8EQyukJwHsUwEwRPG5v0rGNqYtwhFLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 02:24:34 +0530
From: Sasikanth babu <sasikanth.v19@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysfs: Removed dup_name entirely in sysfs_rename
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:16:56PM +0530, Sasikantha babu wrote:
>> Since no one using "dup_name", removed it completely in sysfs_rename,
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@...il.com>
>
> What kernel version did you create this against? There is some odd fuzz
> and offsets aren't right here, you should at the least, make it against
> Linus's latest tree, and ideally against linux-next, this one was made
> against neither, so I can't really apply it.
>
The patch is against Linus latest tree only. I got the same offsets after a
fresh clone.
> Care to refresh it against Linus's tree and resend it so I can apply it?
Will resend the patch with latest Linus's tree.
>
> It makes me wonder how you tested it...
Tested on Kernel 3.4-rc5 version.
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists