[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA2C205.3030801@teksavvy.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 13:36:05 -0400
From: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition
On 12-05-03 08:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/05/2012 14:40, Mark Lord ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> Breaking "hdparm --write-sector /dev/sda1"? I call it a security fix.
>> No, that would plain stupid on both our parts. :)
>> The --write-sector flag is allowed only for non-partitions by hdparm itself.
>
> Excuse my laziness--how does it check?
I don't know if there's a feasible fool-proof method or not.
But what hdparm does is look at the sector offset of the device.
Partitions normally have a non-zero offset.
>> But other flags commonly used by distros at boot time
>> seem to be triggering the current in-kernel noise.
>> Dunno which flags, I'm just ignoring them and waiting
>> for the noise message to get reverted.
>
> That's exactly the behavior I hoped to get when I added the warnings.
> Or maybe not. :) What are the messages?
> i.e. what ioctl do they complain about?
As above:
>> Dunno which flags, I'm just ignoring them and waiting
>> for the noise message to get reverted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists