[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA3799A.6010908@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:39:22 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Silence unnecessary warnings about ioctl to partition
Il 03/05/2012 19:36, Mark Lord ha scritto:
>> > Excuse my laziness--how does it check?
> I don't know if there's a feasible fool-proof method or not.
> But what hdparm does is look at the sector offset of the device.
> Partitions normally have a non-zero offset.
Yeah, that should work.
>>> >> But other flags commonly used by distros at boot time
>>> >> seem to be triggering the current in-kernel noise.
>>> >> Dunno which flags, I'm just ignoring them and waiting
>>> >> for the noise message to get reverted.
>> >
>> > That's exactly the behavior I hoped to get when I added the warnings.
>> > Or maybe not. :) What are the messages?
>> > i.e. what ioctl do they complain about?
> As above:
>
>>> >> Dunno which flags, I'm just ignoring them and waiting
>>> >> for the noise message to get reverted.
I said which ioctls, not which options. I.e. cut-and-paste from dmesg.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists