[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336076080.13866.49.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 13:14:40 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, pebolle@...cali.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd@...horst.net
Subject: Re: [PULL] TPM: MAINTAINERS contacts update and error report fix
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 14:10 -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> The first as the subject implies is just a contacts update, and the second
> makes the driver avoid to mistakenly report the disabled and deactivated TPM
> states as an error.
trivia:
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
[]
> @@ -845,7 +845,16 @@ int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> return rc;
>
> do {
> - rc = __tpm_pcr_read(chip, 0, digest);
> + /* Attempt to read a PCR value */
> + cmd.header.in = pcrread_header;
> + cmd.params.pcrread_in.pcr_idx = cpu_to_be32(0);
> + rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *) &cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
> +
> + if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
> + return -EFAULT;
> + else
> + rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
The else shouldn't be used here.
Indented code followed by an unindented test is not nice.
> +
> if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
> dev_info(chip->dev,
> "TPM is disabled/deactivated (0x%X)\n", rc);
A more kernel style conformant style looks like:
rc = tpm_transmit(chip, (u8 *)&cmd, READ_PCR_RESULT_SIZE);
if (rc < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
return -EFAULT;
rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists