[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336126390.4275.12.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:13:10 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] fat: switch to fsinfo_inode
Hi,
I was having a leave, but now came back to this stuff.
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 22:12 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> If fsinfo is inode, the order can be
>
> 1) flush inodes
> 1a) flush fsinfo inode
> 1b) flush normal inodes
> 2) last iput(normal inodes)
> truncate()
> dirty fsinfo inode
3) a bit later fsinfo inode is flushed again.
Sorry, I do not still see where is the issue.
Also, how is it different form the current situation where
you have absolutely the same.
I really still do not see the issue.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists