linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 04/10] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: rename the smartreflex entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 May 2012 15:41:34 +0530
From:	"J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>
To:	"AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>
Cc:	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@...com>, "rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/10] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: rename the smartreflex entries

Hi AnilKumar,

Thanks for reviewing.

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata <anilkumar@...com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:35, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>
>>
>> Change the name field value to better reflect the smartreflex
>> integration in the system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c |    8 ++++----
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c          |    2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> index 144d118..15907b0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_mpu_irqs[] = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>> -     .name           = "sr1",
>> +     .name           = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
>>       .class          = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>>       .main_clk       = "sr1_fck",
>>       .prcm           = {
>> @@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>> -     .name           = "sr1",
>> +     .name           = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
>>       .class          = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>>       .main_clk       = "sr1_fck",
>>       .prcm           = {
>> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_core_irqs[] = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>> -     .name           = "sr2",
>> +     .name           = "smartreflex_core",
>>       .class          = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>>       .main_clk       = "sr2_fck",
>>       .prcm           = {
>> @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>> -     .name           = "sr2",
>> +     .name           = "smartreflex_core",
>>       .class          = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>>       .main_clk       = "sr2_fck",
>>       .prcm           = {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> index 2edd1e2..d859277 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)
>>               sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
>>               sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
>>               sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
>> -             if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
>> +             if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "smartreflex_mpu_iva"))) {
>
> What if voltage rail is different for mpu and iva? I have seen some devices
> supports SmartReflex have different voltage rails for mpu and iva.
>

I get the point. OMAP3 iva and mpu have a common rail. OMAP4 onwards
even we have different rails for mpu and iva. I will enhance the checks here.

> Regards
> AnilKumar



-- 
Regards and Thanks,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/