[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205041759540.6271@ionos>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:01:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] IRQ: allow check_wakeup_irqs to notice level-triggered
interrupts.
Neil,
On Fri, 4 May 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Why not simply managing the pending bit for level irqs ?
> >
>
> Hi Thomas,
> thanks again for the patch. I finally made time to test it and it works as
> expected. I've included it below with a change-log entry and tested-by:
> in case that helps.
thanks for testing. The changelog is great. You know how to make the
live of lazy buggers easier :)
> for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> - if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
> + if (desc->depth == 1 &&
> + irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
> if (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
> return -EBUSY;
> continue;
I split that part into a separate patch, as it's really a different
issue.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists