[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 21:30:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot
On Saturday, May 05, 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Now, if you insist on us having a separate mach- directory for every platform
> > (SoC), we can do that I think, but then we should start with splitting up the
> > existing mach-shmobile into a number of SoC-specific directories rather than
> > adding new mach- directories for random new parts, because that goes against
> > our development history to date, which is important too IMHO.
>
> All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a
> significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile,
> sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one
> uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with
> Renesas.
I see. So your opinion is that it may have more in common with the other
ARM-based platforms?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists