[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120507155855.GJ18810@erda.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:58:55 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf/x86-ibs: Add support for IBS pseudo events
On 07.05.12 17:51:51, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 17:44 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 07.05.12 15:03:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 20:26 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > > +enum ibs_filter_type {
> > > > + IBS_NO_FILTER = 0,
> > > > + IBS_MATCH_FILTER = 1,
> > > > + IBS_ANY_SET_FILTER = 2,
> > > > + IBS_PSEUDO_EVENT = 0x0F,
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > I don't get how those pseudo events work, AFAIKT IBS_PSEUDO_EVENT causes
> > > one to loose all events since it does have a filter set but fails the
> > > filter and thus we skip the call to perf_event_overflow().
> >
> > You periodically (fix clk cycles or number of micro-ops) trigger IBS
> > samples and afterwards analyses the samples for certain filter rules
> > (see rule description in pmu-ibs.c).
>
> But IBS_PSEUDO_EVENT will fail all filter test and you'll end up with
> exactly 0 samples. Still somewhat confused..
Ahh, got your question. This is a place holder for writing the pseudo
event id's (0xF000 mask) directly in config[12]. But this is not yet
implemented. And since we probably all prefer userland filtering we
just don't need this at all.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists