[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205071049040.1060@router.home>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:51:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-sched-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/41] nohz: Move nohz load balancer selection into idle
logic
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> [ ** BUGGY PATCH: I need to put more thinking into this ** ]
>
> We want the nohz load balancer to be an idle CPU, thus
> move that selection to strict dyntick idle logic.
An idle cpu? We may want to put it on a busy cpu that is running high
latency OS tasks. Would it be possible to have an option where we can pin
the load balancer to a specific cpu?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists