linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for uprobes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120508092041.GE27323@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 11:20:41 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for
 uprobes


* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]:
> 
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest 
> > > uprobes patches:
> > > 
> > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS)
> > 
> > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo?
> 
> 
> I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th.
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> 	Since you had asked me to send the patch series again 
> after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...]

Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now 
reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional 
way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that 
instead of rebasing the branch.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/