lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 11:20:41 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for
 uprobes


* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]:
> 
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest 
> > > uprobes patches:
> > > 
> > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS)
> > 
> > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo?
> 
> 
> I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th.
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> 	Since you had asked me to send the patch series again 
> after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...]

Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now 
reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional 
way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that 
instead of rebasing the branch.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ