lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 14:49:42 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface
 for uprobes

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> [2012-05-08 11:20:41]:

> 
> * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest 
> > > > uprobes patches:
> > > > 
> > > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS)
> > > 
> > > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo?
> > 
> > 
> > I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th.
> > 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > 	Since you had asked me to send the patch series again 
> > after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...]
> 
> Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now 
> reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional 
> way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that 
> instead of rebasing the branch.
> 

Okay .. will send the delta patch now

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ