[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205081014480.27713@router.home>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:16:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-sched-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/41] cpuset: Set up interface for nohz flag
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > As I have said before: It would be much simpler if one could specify the
> > set of nohz cpus independently of cpusets. Having a flag f.e. as a file in
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/nohz
>
> I don't know if it would be simpler. It's just a different interface
> to set a per-CPU property.
> Cpusets of sysfs, I don't mind either way.
>
> What is the usual policy on where to put which kind of CPU property?
/sys/devices/system/cpu contains the state information for each processor.
There are already cpumasks in there that can be used to monitor and modify
per processor behavior.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists