[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA93946.2000302@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 08:18:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
CC: mgorman@...e.de, npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
glommer@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu, avi@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, dhowells@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
borislav.petkov@....com, yinghai@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
cpw@....com, steiner@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
penberg@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, trenn@...e.de, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/tlb: add tlb flush all factor for specific
CPUs
On 05/08/2012 07:03 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> - if (!cpu_has_invlpg || vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB) {
> + if (!cpu_has_invlpg || vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB
> + || !tlb_flushall_factor) {
OK nevermind on the division by zero, but this yet another test being
performed.
If nothing else you could fold these tests and make tlb_flushall_factor
zero if !cpu_has_invlpg.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists