[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336560579.2097.32.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:49:39 +1000
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: In kernel hibernation, suspend to both
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:40 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > + error = suspend_devices_and_enter(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
>
>
> I can imagine running into a host of problems here, since the suspend
> sequence is not carried out fully, from the beginning.
>
> For example, this will skip sending out the PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE and the
> PM_POST_SUSPEND notifiers. Worse, we actually send out the
> PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE
> and PM_POST_HIBERNATION notifiers and then do a suspend instead,
> underneath!
>
> (Similar cases for the rest of the notifiers sent during suspend vs
> hibernation).
>
> Don't we need to handle such things properly, in order to make
> suspend-to-both
> work reliably?
Honest answer - I have absolutely no idea. I've seen the code of
suspend-utils (i.e. user mode stuff) and it seems to me that it does
exactly this. Could be wrong of course, just like many times before.
Rafael?
--
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists