[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aba7b996-df0e-420c-b2eb-d32881660fe8@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:11:30 +1000
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: In kernel hibernation, suspend to both
Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com> wrote:
>Honest answer - I have absolutely no idea. I've seen the code of
>suspend-utils (i.e. user mode stuff) and it seems to me that it does
>exactly this. Could be wrong of course, just like many times before.
What makes me think that this may not be that bad is the fact that post-resume, it will actually be hibernation code that will be unwinding things. So like this: prepare for hibernation, create image, suspend to memory (equivalent to hibernation failure of some kind, really), resume from memory, unwind from unsuccessful hibernation.
No?
--
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists