[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4FAABDDA0200007800082998@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 17:56:26 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5, resend] PCI: adjust quirk handler section
annotations
>>> On 09.05.12 at 18:08, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 09.05.12 at 17:54, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> My inclination is that all PCI fixups should work the same for
>>> hot-added devices as for those present at boot, which would suggest
>>> that we should always use __devinit, not __init. If I'm missing
>>> something, please educate me :)
>>
>> That's certainly possible - I simply based the patch on what is there
>> currently.
>
> Yep, your patch makes perfect sense considering the tree as it is
> today. But if you agree with my sense of what it *should* be, I think
> we should leave things as they are, or work on moving everything
I indeed wondered why it isn't that way while doing this.
> towards __devinit (I'd be thrilled if you wanted to work on that :)).
> Otherwise we'd just be changing things to __init that we'd have to
> change back later.
I'd perhaps rather drop my patches then, as the main benefit
(moving stuff from resident text to init text) would go away.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists