[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201205091857.14406.wolfgang.walter@stwm.de>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 18:57:13 +0200
From: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.3.x: e1000 and ixgbe hang
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2012 schrieben Sie:
> From: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:07:11 +0200
>
> > c) Dave Miller is a busy man.
>
> Therefore pinging me on crap like this makes me a more busy man, so
> don't do it, unless you want it to take even longer for me to get
> to it.
I don't understand why you are so unfriendly.
I didn't sent you any mail nor did I complain to you. If you read my first
mail on this issue then you will see that.
But when we are at it: I think that when a bug in a stable kernel is found and
the final fix is known it is bad practice to hord that patch till submission
without letting stable@ know about it. I don't mean that the patch should go
into the stable tree immediately. Of course it makes sense to wait some time
to see if it works in Linus' tree. But why should other people waste their
time hunting a bug already solved? And why deny people the fix?
Regards,
--
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists