linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: change config_enabled() to accept X instead of CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 May 2012 22:05:28 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: change config_enabled() to accept X
	instead of CONFIG_X

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:01PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:56 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:46:35AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > > change config_enabled() to use it as config_enabled(SMP) instead of
> > > config_enabled(CONFIG_SMP).
> > 
> > You are breaking all existing users.
> 
> I checked the mainline and there were no users as far as I checked.
> Referring to some upcoming code? Just curious to see why I missed.
I assume that as it is in the tree someone has used it.
There are no users in the upstream kernel but I did not check -next.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/