linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/tegra: smmu: Add device tree support for SMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 12:04:57 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC:	Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/tegra: smmu: Add device tree support for SMMU

On 05/11/2012 03:46 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:08:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 01:50 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>>> The necessary info is expected to pass from DT.
>>>
>>> For more precise resource reservation, there shouldn't be any
>>> overlapping of register range between SMMU and MC. SMMU register
>>> offset needs to be calculated correctly, based on its register bank.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
>>
>> I expect patch 1 will go through the IOMMU tree, and I'll take patch 2
>> through the Tegra tree.
> 
> Any reason for splitting it up? The patches touch mostly drivers/iommu.
> So to avoid conflicts its probably the best to apply them together.

Patch 1 is the driver that touches drivers/iommu and related
documentation, whereas patch 2 touches the device tree file in
arch/arm/boot/dts. Either of the patches would get conflicts if they
were merged into the "other" tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/