[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB143C4.6030502@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:41:24 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>
CC: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/tegra: smmu: Add device tree support for SMMU
On 05/10/2012 01:50 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> The necessary info is expected to pass from DT.
>
> For more precise resource reservation, there shouldn't be any
> overlapping of register range between SMMU and MC. SMMU register
> offset needs to be calculated correctly, based on its register bank.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>
> ---
> This patch requires the following ones, sent earlier:
>
> DMA window:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/4603
This patch has been merged even though the patch above isn't present in
the kernel anywhere, let alone in the history of the iommu tree. This
breaks compilation in linux-next.
> AHB:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/4657
This patch is in linux-next, but also is not in the history of the iommu
tree, so will break bisection of the iommu tree for Tegra.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists