linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace percpu_ops function with this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FB142D1.7080403@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 10:37:21 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	bp@...64.org, davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, luto@....edu,
	glommer@...allels.com, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, vapier@...too.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, dzickus@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	cbouatmailru@...il.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
	ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org, anton@...ba.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace percpu_ops function with this_cpu_ops

On 05/14/2012 10:34 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:00:12PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> I am sorry for mess commit log previous patchset.
>>
>> As Andrew Morton's request, I combind and clean up the patchset.
>>
>> According to Ingo's complain. I use the same and short 
>> 'this_cpu_ops' functions in x86 part code.
>>
>> Thanks for all comments!
>>
>> [PATCH 1/3] net: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx or
>> [PATCH 2/3] x86: replace percpu_xxx funcs with this_cpu_xxx
>> [PATCH 3/3] percpu: remove percpu_xxx() functions
> 
> All three patches look good to me.
> 
>  Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> 
> I guess 0001 can go through net, 0002 through x86 and I can merge the
> third one once both are in mainline.  David, hpa, can you guys please
> take the respective patch?
> 

I would be happier if we kept the patchset together.

So I would greatly prefer if you'd take the whole patchset with my:

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/