[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514105604.GB29102@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:56:04 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
neilb@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
michaelc@...wisc.edu, emunson@...bm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] netvm: Prevent a stream-specific deadlock
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:10:34AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:54:14 +0100
>
> > It could happen that all !SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets have buffered so
> > much data that we're over the global rmem limit. This will prevent
> > SOCK_MEMALLOC buffers from receiving data, which will prevent userspace
> > from running, which is needed to reduce the buffered data.
> >
> > Fix this by exempting the SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets from the rmem limit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>
> This introduces an invariant which I am not so sure is enforced.
>
> With this change it is absolutely required that once a socket
> becomes SOCK_MEMALLOC it must never _ever_ lose that attribute.
>
This is effectively true. In the NFS case, the flag is cleared on
swapoff after all the entries have been paged in. In the NBD case,
SOCK_MEMALLOC is left set until the socket is destroyed. I'll update the
changelog.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists