[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120514.162634.1094732813264319951.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mgorman@...e.de
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
neilb@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
michaelc@...wisc.edu, emunson@...bm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] netvm: Prevent a stream-specific deadlock
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:56:04 +0100
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:10:34AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:54:14 +0100
>>
>> > It could happen that all !SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets have buffered so
>> > much data that we're over the global rmem limit. This will prevent
>> > SOCK_MEMALLOC buffers from receiving data, which will prevent userspace
>> > from running, which is needed to reduce the buffered data.
>> >
>> > Fix this by exempting the SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets from the rmem limit.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>>
>> This introduces an invariant which I am not so sure is enforced.
>>
>> With this change it is absolutely required that once a socket
>> becomes SOCK_MEMALLOC it must never _ever_ lose that attribute.
>>
>
> This is effectively true. In the NFS case, the flag is cleared on
> swapoff after all the entries have been paged in. In the NBD case,
> SOCK_MEMALLOC is left set until the socket is destroyed. I'll update the
> changelog.
Bugs happen, you need to find a way to assert that nobody every does
this. Because if a bug is introduced which makes this happen, it will
otherwise be very difficult to debug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists