[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514193134.GA18366@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:31:35 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:21:47PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 22:14 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > They seem to be in net-next, or did I miss something?
>
> Yes, you re-introduce in this patch some bugs already fixed in macvtap
Could explain why I see some problems in testing :)
Maybe common code should go into net/core?
I couldn't decide whether the increase in kernel
size is worth it.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists