linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337104800.8220.25.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 11:00:00 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support

On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 22:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:21:47PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 22:14 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > 
> > > They seem to be in net-next, or did I miss something?
> > 
> > Yes, you re-introduce in this patch some bugs already fixed in
> macvtap
> 
> Could explain why I see some problems in testing :)
> Maybe common code should go into net/core?
> I couldn't decide whether the increase in kernel
> size is worth it.

Which problem you hit during testing?

The logic of zerocopy_sg_from_iovec should work well. Jason's fix made
the code more clear.

Thanks
Shirley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/