linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337088703.2528.208.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 16:31:43 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
	Bastian Hecht <hechtb@...glemail.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> while ((readl(...))&&  timeout-->  0)
> >>     cpu_relax();
> 
> As I understand loops_per_jiffy, this loop will take much longer than
> the 100 ms you defined above?

Not sure about much, but longer. The idea is that this is about the
error path so if we report -EIO with a slight delay - no problem.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)