[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337092577.27694.45.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:36:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org,
riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu, avi@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, borislav.petkov@....com,
yinghai@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, cpw@....com,
steiner@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...nel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
tj@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jmorris@...ei.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yongjie.ren@...el.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/tlb: optimizing flush_tlb_mm
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:24 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Sorry. I don't understand what's the comments Peter's made days ago. I should ask for more details originally.
>
> So, Peter, the correct change should like following, am I right?
>
> -#define tlb_flush(tlb) flush_tlb_mm((tlb)->mm)
> +#define tlb_flush(tlb, start, end) __flush_tlb_range((tlb)->mm, start, end)
No.. the correct change is to do range tracking like the other archs
that support flush_tlb_range() do.
You do not modify the tlb interface.
Again, see: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=129952026504268&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists