[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB2C8EA.6020800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:51:46 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, paul@...lmenage.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl, nacc@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org, mschmidt@...hat.com,
berrange@...hat.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, liuj97@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] cpusets, suspend: Save and restore cpusets during
suspend/resume
On 05/16/2012 02:38 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:05 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>>
>> Why can't we leave cpuset.cpus unaltered for all cpusets during suspend?
>
> We can, that's what Srivatsa is going to make.
And which I did :-) (well, essentially that's what this patchset (v3) did.)
> The only thing I object
> to is the !suspend hotplug case.
>
...which is out of the way now, in this version. This version of the patchset
touches only the suspend/resume case. Nothing else.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists